Saturday, September 5, 2015

Evaluation of Social Media Sources

This post is in continuance with my two previous posts on the "Evaluation of General Sources" and the "Evaluation of Scholarly Sources." I will now be analyzing two social media sources regarding the same controversy.

Source 1

Bohland, Alyssa. "Screenshot of kirstyross85 instagram post'" 9/5/2015 via instagram.
Credibility
Kirsty Ross is reliable as an outside source. Though the word controversy is often associated with negativity, I believe it is important to remember that there are those that will be in support of a controversy. Kirsty Ross supports the ethic decisions of the nurses who cared for her own children during their stay in the NICU. She is a credible source as a mother.

Location
Though not currently in the NICU, she alludes to her past residency. She is a direct reference to the center of the controversy, the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. 

Network
Kirsty is a mother in every aspect. Her network is one of family-friends, etc. However, Kirsty is also credited as being the author of several books, including an event planner and a poetry assistance book. Though she is not directly connected to a national organization, I still believe she is a viable source to this controversy. 

Content
Her claims could be verified by the hospital that she mentioned in her post, the Doncaster Women's Hospital, and, more personally, by her friends and family. 

Contextual Updates
As this was a unique occurrence in her life, she does not post often on the topic. However, this is actually in support of the source. She has no reason to recount her experience in the NICU, yet she does on a day meant to thank the institution.

Age
Kirsty's instagram account is several weeks old, though the memory she recounts is years old. 

Reliability
She is reliable as a source. She has personal experience with the controversy in question. As a first hand witness, she is very important to the "scene of the crime."


Source 2

Bohland, Alyssa. "Screenshot of 'Palliative Care and Ethical Issues in the NICU' Video" 9/5/2015 via YouTube.
Credibility
This source of social media can be corroborated. The YouTube page is directly linked to hospital known as Children's Mercy Kansas City, an award-winning hospital.

Location
Those who are featured in the video are present in the credited location (Children's Mercy Kansas City hospital).

Network
It can only be assumed that those who are subscribed to the Children's Mercy Kansas City YouTube page are interested in the medical profession. This though cannot be one-hundred percent verified. The doctors featured in the video, however, are undeniably credible.

Content
The information debated in the video can be corroborated from many different sources. The video is not on an opinion, it is on the facts of the controversy itself. 

Contextual Updates
This YouTube page regularly uploads videos on the medical field. They have hundreds of videos, posted several times a month.

Age
This YouTube channel dates back to March 28th, 2008. It is a very experienced source.

Reliability
This source is reliable. It includes the knowledge of hundreds of doctors on research corroborated by thousands. 

No comments:

Post a Comment